New Delhi, Aug 17: Kursk region, intensifying its incursion into Russian territory. This operation, as reported by Russian officials and cited by BBC News, took place near the town of Glushkovo and severed a key supply route used by the Kremlin to support its troops. The destruction of the bridge could significantly impede Russian military logistics in the area.
The Ukraine-Russia conflict, now in its third year, has seen numerous shifts in battlefield dynamics. Ukraine’s recent incursion into the Kursk region represents its deepest penetration into Russian territory since the conflict began.
This move is part of a broader strategy by Ukraine to disrupt Russian military operations and gain leverage in the ongoing war.
The Kursk region holds strategic importance due to its proximity to the Ukrainian border and its role as a supply corridor for Russian forces operating in eastern Ukraine.
By targeting infrastructure like the Seym River bridge, Ukraine aims to weaken Russia’s ability to reinforce and resupply its troops, thereby putting pressure on Moscow to reconsider its military objectives.
Military and Political Reactions
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has asserted that Ukrainian troops are strengthening their positions in the Kursk region, describing the captured territories as an “exchange fund.” This implies that Kyiv may be willing to trade these areas for Ukrainian regions currently occupied by Moscow. However, military analysts remain sceptical about Ukraine’s ability to hold these territories.
Monica Duffy Toft, Director of the Center for Strategic Studies at Tufts University, to the TASS news agency, expressed doubts about the sustainability of Ukraine’s advance. Writing for Responsible Statecraft, Toft noted that Ukraine’s armed forces are unlikely to maintain a foothold in the Kursk region and will eventually be forced to retreat.
She emphasized that, materially, the incursion is expected to have limited lasting impact, as Ukraine’s surviving troops and equipment will likely be redirected to other critical areas of the conflict.
Similarly, Mark Episkopos, a research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Public Administration, highlighted Ukraine’s lack of long-term capacity to hold even the modest territory it is currently contesting.
This sentiment reflects broader concerns about the feasibility of Ukraine’s cross-border operations, given the challenges of sustaining a prolonged military presence in hostile territory.
Humanitarian Impact and Escalation
The incursion has not only military but also significant humanitarian consequences. As Ukraine’s operation enters its second week, more than 120,000 people have fled the affected areas in the Kursk region.
Despite Kyiv’s territorial gains, Ukrainian officials have repeatedly stated that they do not seek to occupy Russian land. Mykhailo Podolyak, a senior aide to President Zelensky, emphasized that Ukraine’s primary objective is to force Moscow to negotiate on terms favourable to Kyiv.
On the ground, the Ukrainian military continues to report progress. Oleksandr Syrsky, the head of Ukraine’s military, announced further advances, with Ukrainian troops moving between one to three kilometres in some areas. Syrsky also indicated hopes of capturing a significant number of Russian prisoners in the ongoing battle near the village of Mala Loknya, close to the border.
Russian Response and Counteroffensive
In response to Ukraine’s advance, Russian officials have announced the evacuation of five villages in the Belgorod region, which borders Ukraine. Belgorod governor Vyacheslav Gladkov stated that access to these settlements would be restricted starting August 19, with residents being evacuated and assisted in removing their property.
Simultaneously, Russian forces have been making gains in Ukraine’s eastern regions. Moscow recently claimed the capture of Serhiivka, the latest in a series of towns taken by Russian troops in recent weeks.
These advances bring Russian forces closer to the city of Pokrovsk, a critical logistics hub that is vital for supplying Ukrainian troops on the eastern front. The intensified fighting in Donetsk and surrounding areas has led to further civilian casualties and an urgent call for evacuation from local authorities.
The Broader Context and Future Outlook
Ukraine’s offensive in the Kursk region, launched on August 6, represents a significant escalation in the conflict. The operation has resulted in substantial casualties, with reports indicating that 12 civilians were killed and 121 people injured, including children.
The Russian Defense Ministry claims that Ukrainian forces have suffered heavy losses, with up to 2,860 troops killed and significant military equipment destroyed since the fighting began.
TASS news agency reports that Ukraine’s daily losses are substantial, including hundreds of troops and dozens of armoured vehicles. These figures reflect the intense and costly nature of the conflict, which continues to exact a heavy toll on both sides.
As the situation develops, it remains uncertain how long Ukraine can sustain its incursion into Russian territory. The strategic gains, while significant, may be temporary, and the humanitarian impact is likely to grow as the conflict drags on.
While Ukraine’s bold incursion into the Kursk region marks a significant moment in the conflict, its long-term success remains in question. Its outcome will likely shape the next phase of this protracted war.